ABSTRACT
Richard S Bourne, Cosetta Minelli, Gary H Mills, and Rosalind Kandler
Sleep disturbances are common in critically ill patients
and have been characterised by numerous studies using polysomnography. Issues
regarding patient populations, monitoring duration and timing (nocturnal versus
continuous), as well as practical problems encountered in critical care studies
using polysomnography are considered with regard to future interventional
studies on sleep. Polysomnography is the gold standard in objectively measuring
the quality and quantity of sleep. However, it is difficult to undertake,
particularly in patients recovering from critical illness in an acute-care
area. Therefore, other objective (actigraphy and bispectral index) and
subjective (nurse or patient assessment) methods have been used in other
critical care studies. Each of these techniques has its own particular
advantages and disadvantages. We use data from an interventional study to
compare agreement between four of these alternative techniques in the
measurement of nocturnal sleep quantity. Recommendations for further
developments in sleep monitoring techniques for research and clinical
application are made. Also, methodological problems in studies validating
various sleep measurement techniques are explored.
(Crit Care. 2007; 11(4): 226.)
Full Text: CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment