ABSTRACT
By Anjannette Cook, RN, BSN, Delyla Laughlin, RN,
Margery Moore, RN, BSN, Doreen North, RN, Kathleen Wilkins, RN, BA, BSN, Gay
Wong, RN, BSN, Allyson Wallace-Scroggs, RN, MSc, and Lisa Halvorsen, RN,
PhD, APRN-BC.
Background Blood for glucose analysis is
often obtained interchangeably from indwelling catheters and fingersticks.
Objectives To determine the level of
agreement between glucose values obtained by laboratory analysis and with a
pointof-care device for blood from 2 different sources: fingerstick and a
central venous catheter.
Methods A method-comparison design was
used. Point-of-care values for blood from fingersticks and catheters were
compared with laboratory values for blood from catheters in a convenience sample
of 67 critically ill patients. The effects of hematocrit level and finger edema
on differences in glucose values between the
2 methods were also evaluated. A t
test was used to determine differences in glucose values obtained via the 2
methods. Differences and limits of agreement were also calculated.
Results Laboratory glucose values for
blood from a catheter differed significantly from point-of-care values for
blood from the catheter (t1,66 = -9.18; P < .001) and from a fingerstick
(t1,66 =6.53; P < .001). Glucose values for the 2 methods differed by 20mg/dL
or more for 1 of 6 patients (15%) for catheter samples and for 1 of 5 (21%) for
fingerstick samples. Point-of-care glucose values for fingerstick and catheter
samples did not differ (P = .98). Hematocrit level significantly explained the
difference in glucose values between the 2 methods for both catheter (R2 =
0.288;
P < .001) and fingerstick (R2 =
0.280; P = .02) samples.
Conclusions Use of a commonly used
point-of-care device when precise glucose values are needed may lead to faulty
treatment decisions. (American Journal of
Critical Care. 2009;18:65-72)
Full Text: CLICK HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment